This afternoon the Ministry Committee heard resolutions D002
and D019. The room was full, the
testimony sign-up lists overflowing with overwhelmingly supportive people. The committee itself is large—forty
members – which made getting up to speak that much more overwhelming for those
who did it. But what an amazing
collective witness we offered.
In addition to trans people ourselves, a striking number of
allies came forward, including two bishops. One of them was my bishop, Tom Shaw, who spoke of our experience
in the diocese of Massachusetts with trans clergy as well as strong support for
the trans community more generally.
Striking testimony was offered by Vivian Taylor whose writings have been
share on this blog before. Vivian
spoke of finding a home in the Episcopal Church during college, prior to her
deployment to Iraq as a chaplain’s assistant, and her intention to enter
discernment for ordained ministry. Bishop Chet Talton spoke of the stance of full welcome that he has supported in the Diocese of San Joaquin, and of the ministry of Carolyn Woodall who was ordained a deacon this spring.
The lone dissenting testimony was offered by a deputy from
the diocese of Albany. The main
sentiment she shared was a sense of isolation in her disagreement with
resolution D002. When gently
pressed by Bishop Mary Glasspool to be more specific about her concern, the
deputy indicated her belief that “God doesn’t make mistakes” and that those who
transition inherently assert the opposite. Bishop Shaw and I also answered a
question from another deputy from the diocese of Albany about how to respond to
people in that diocese who may feel alienated by the passage of these
resolutions. Both of us emphasized
the importance of relationships, of staying in conversation, of recognizing the
humanity of one another, even and especially when we disagree. This deputy also turned out to live
only twenty minutes from where my spouse grew up in central New York
state. The world is small, and we
must be gentle to one another.
After forty-five minutes of testimony on both resolutions,
the chair ended the session.
Because there were so many more people who wanted to testify,
unfortunately, many were not able to, and we will be posting more testimony
here. When the session ended, we
streamed out into the hall, hugging each other and sighing huge sighs of
relief. While a number of us
dispersed, a few stayed behind to hear debate and voting on the resolutions. As it turned out, the vote was very
straight forward: both D002 and
D019 were passed out of committee and now head to the House of Bishops. They should come there in the next
couple of days.
Tomorrow at 2pm there will be a hearing on another trans
related resolution, D022, the Churchwide Response to Bullying. Stay tuned for news on that resolution as well as House of
Bishops movement on D002 and D019.
CP
About a year ago, I was asked point-blank how I, as a Christian, saw my transition and if I thought God made a mistake. The woman (a minister) who asked me was a strong ally when it came to civil protections but was struggling with how to reconcile her civil support with beliefs about God.
ReplyDeleteThis was what I said to her (and, obviously, I only speak for myself here): Someone asked me a few months ago if I wish I'd just been born male. And I told them no. I am so grateful for the perspective I had to transition. This is who I am called to be and how I am called to be in the world. So, no, I don't believe God made a mistake. I believe that this is the path God set me upon, however much it may have sucked along the way.
We talked more about how others saw their own experiences differently and that I didn't think any one narrative was more true than another, but she thanked me later for giving her another way to think about it and that I'd helped her move through her reservations.
I leave it here in the hopes it might help others do the same.